A group of scientists believe that global warming is an irreversible process. Another group of scientists feel that human intervention can reverse the global warming process. Which of these is the most likely outcome of differences in opinions of scientists on the issue of global warming? (2 points)
a. All old ideas would be discarded.
b.Scientific evidence would be weakened.
c.New ideas would be created and tested.
d.The limitations of science would be evident.

Respuesta :

The appropriate answer is c. new ideas would be created and tested. The difference of opinion between both groups of scientists would encourage each group to create and test new ideas, each in the hope that either theory will be validated. A difference in opinion in this case will not lead to discarding old ideas, weakening scientific evidence or a realization of the limits of science.

The new answer will be C

Hope this helps...